It is used for music creation and production, sound for picture (sound design, audio post-production and mixing) and, more generally, sound recording, editing, and mastering processes. Other than those two things, it works perfectly well and is very stable here. Pro Tools is a digital audio workstation (DAW) developed and released by Avid Technology (formerly Digidesign) for Microsoft Windows and macOS. Then in Cubase / Nuendo, set a recording offset in the ASIO settings to compensate and all will be well. If you find it be an issue for you, the workaround is to take the time to measure the round trip latency at all sample rates, and at all buffer sizes you might use. You also will have issues using hardware inserts, as the drivers are mis-representing round trip latency and Nuendo / Cubase compensate based on those figures. However anything over 128, and your recorded audio will actually appear too early on your timeline. At low buffer settings the discrepancy can be as little as 20-30 samples which would be inaudible for a performance. It is generally not a problem at buffer sizes under 128. The other issue is a little more complicated: The Avid ASIO driver reports incorrect latency figures to Cubase / Nuendo. There are 2 issues though: You have to run Cubase / Nuendo "as an administrator" or you will not be able to change sample rates or buffer sizes. I use Nuendo 7 with my HD Native hardware and it works well for tracking duties at low latencies. No sample based VI (even on Pro Tools HD) can use HDX DSP for plugin processing.Īs for IO, you are using the ASIO support in HD Native or HDX and can use that for 64 IO on the first HDX card or up to 64 IO on a HD Native card. HDX is a lot of expense for no benefit with Cubase.Ĭubase plugins can't use HDX DSPs for plugin processing. Does anyone use both on the same system and use the Avid card for I/O and can help set my expectations? I am primarily talking about playback of my editing / VIs / mix, not recording/tracking. I'm OK with using Pro Tools for more serious tracking if it is necessary, but want to know if Cubase is solid running on the HDX/HD cards for my music producing work. How good will Cubase performance be using Avid HDX or HD Native cards as the interface?. I'm going to buy a Pro Tools setup for post work. Calibrating your I/O is easy with Symphony I/O Mk II HD’s front panel touchscreen.I use Cubase and Kontakt (PC/Windows-based) for music production, plus some some basic tracking for personal work (just recording my own self vocals + guitar - no client-driven work or band sessions). Need even more channels? You can utilize multiple units simultaneously, with one Symphony I/O Mk II HD per every Pro Tools HD port in your system. In fact, each I/O module installed in Symphony I/O Mk II HD appears and functions in Pro Tools HD the same if it were a separate Avid HD I/O interface, so set up is easy and you can take advantage of important Pro Tools features such as sample-accurate delay compensation.Ī single Symphony I/O Mk II HD unit can have up to 32 simultaneous analog I/O, so you can have more channels with less rack gear. Symphony I/O Mk II HD can be utilized alongside or in place of Avid® or Digidesign® interfaces for Pro Tools HD. Whether using a Mac or PC based studio, Symphony I/O Mk II HD can connect directly to your Pro Tools HDX, Pro Tools HD Native or Pro Tools Core/Accel systems. Up to 192 input and output channels can be used simultaneously (with 3 HDX PCIe cards) 2048 Audio tracks with Hybrid Engine switched on. Symphony I/O Mk II HD is designed for the Pro Tools HD user who needs a multi-channel audio interface with the best sound quality at an incredible cost per channel value. With Pro Tools Ultimate software, including 1-year support plan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |